Bush Didn’t Lie – but He Might Have Been Wrong
Wednesday, December 26th, 2007President Bush’s muscular foreign policy – especially the centerpiece of his execution of the War on Terror: the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq – is based not only on the (perhaps mistaken) threat of WMD, but also on the altruistic motive of liberating the masses oppressed by radical Islam. Standing in the best and noblest American tradition, he proclaimed that “eventually, the call of freedom comes to every mind and every soul.”
I’m not so sure.
The Statue of Liberty calls to the “huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” Score one for W.
Thomas Jefferson observed that “all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed” – but then declared that enough was enough! Score two for W.
Novelists, perhaps more sensitive to the human spirit, have long doubted mankind’s preference for liberty over security.
Thomas Mann’s character Leo Naphta put it this way: “It is ultimately a cruel misunderstanding of youth to believe it will find its heart’s desire in freedom. Its deepest desire is to obey.”
Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor accused Jesus of failure: “And we shall give them bread in Your name and lie, telling them that it is in Your name. …So, in the end, they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us: ‘Enslave us, but feed us!’ …There is nothing a free man is so anxious to do as to find something to worship.”
Orwell’s Big Brother similarly convinced his subjects: “Slavery is freedom.”
The long insurgency in Iraq, the re-emergence of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the electoral affirmation of former-KGB Vladmir Putin’s United Russia party, the razor-thin defeat at the ballot box of Hugo Chavez’ attempt to become ”presidente for life” in Venezuela, and even the growing preference for the nanny state here in America, persuade me that, sadly, the novelists are right and the politicians are wrong.
The attempt to cultivate democracy – without the philosophical foundation which only Christianity can provide – is noble but misguided, and ultimately doomed to failure.