Archive for August, 2007

The Naked Hand of God: Meditation on a Miracle

Sunday, August 26th, 2007

The small boat you’re in is sinking fast in the midst of a furious squall.  Amid the screaming winds and relentless rains, it occurs to you that you have attended funerals of others who have drowned, but you never thought (seriously, at least) on those somber occasions that their fate might someday be your own.  Now you realize that in a matter of minutes, the boat will disappear under the frenzied waves, and in a few days, your family and friends will attend your funeral as you had attended those of others.

Then, at the stern of the boat, Jesus yells something out into the night (you can’t quite make out what, for all the noise and commotion - a desperate prayer, perhaps?).  To your amazement, within seconds the winds disappear, the rains slow to a drizzle and then stop, and the waves – well, there are no waves.  The boat, so violently tossed about just a few moments ago, sits motionless on the water, as the image of the clouds scudding across the moon reflects off of the lake’s surface, which is as now smooth as glass.  The only evidence now of the near-fatal storm is the water dripping serenly from the mast, the oars, and the disciples’ beards.

“And there was a great calm.”

None of the other disciples moves or speaks, as if they’re afraid to break the spell and risk starting up the storm again.  From His place at the stern, Jesus looks around at the group as if He has just done something He would have preferred not to have to do - or at least that He would have preferred not to be observed doing.  He turns away again and looks off into the night.

It is only when you are standing safely on shore that anybody dares to speak, and even then it is only a slow, halting whisper when Jesus is a safe distance away: “What manner of man is this?  Even the winds and the waves obey him!”  There is no answer to such a question, of course…

You don’t sleep well.  You feel that tonight, in some inscrutable way, you have seen the glove of nature removed and observed the naked hand of God.

Celebrating Discipline(s)

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007
Richard Foster’s Celebration of Discipline is one of the faculty readings for this year.  I commend it to all of us because of our mutually-expressed need and desire to stoke the fires of godly living in our campus culture this year.  If teachers are going to lead students to greater godliness, we must first go there ourselves.
I consider Celebration of Discipline to be one of the top 10 most formative books to my own life.
Foster is a Quaker, and he clearly writes from that perspective (e.g., reliance upon inner spiritual light, abounding in mercy and forgiveness, importance of the gathered community).  However, he is also clearly grounded in the classical spiritual disciplines far beyond just the Quaker tradition, quoting ancient church fathers and medieval mystics as well as more recent saints.  The fact that Elton Trueblood wrote the Introduction speaks of the high quality of his thought and writing.
Foster structures the book in three major parts, each containing four chapters.
PART 1: THE INWARD DISCIPLINES: Meditation, Prayer, Fasting, Study
PART 2: THE OUTWARD DISCIPLINES: Simplicity, Solitude, Submission, Service
PART 3: THE CORPORATE DISCIPLINES: Confession, Worship, Guidance, Celebration
Foster recognizes that many (most?) of the Disciplines have fallen into disuse by many (most?) believers, so he includes very practical advice re: getting started in each of them.  However, he constantly reminds us that the Classical Disciplines are not just for spiritual giants, but for all of us who want to grow in grace.
I love the book, but I do think it would have been more complete if he had included a chapter on Church Discipline.  You pick up principles and bits and pieces of this topic from other chapters (Submission, Confession, Guidance), but a more focused and concentrated treatment would have enriched the book.  He could have subsumed Celebration under Worship, and thus added Church Discipline into the Corporate Disciplines section without losing the overall structure of the book.
Rather than engaging in a detailed analysis of the book (we’ll do that together), I’ll whet your appetite by letting Foster speak for himself.  Here is a quote from each chapter.
Introduction: “Joy is the keynote of all the Disciplines.  The purpose of the Disciplines is liberation from the stifling slavery to self-interest and fear.”
Meditation: “If we hope to move beyond the superficialities of our culture – including our religious culture – we must be willing to go down into the recreating silences, into the inner world of contemplation.”
Prayer: “To pray is to change.  Prayer is the central avenue God uses to transform us.  If we are unwilling to change, we will abandon prayer as a noticeable characteristic of our lives.”
Fasting: “More than any other single Discipline, fasting reveals the things that control us.  …In many ways your stomach is like a spoiled child, and spoiled children do not need indulgence, they need discipline.”
Study: “In study there are two ‘books’ to be studied: verbal and nonverbal.  Books and lectures, therefore, consitute only half of the field of study, perhaps less.  The world of nature and, most important, the careful observation of events and actions are the primary nonverbal fields of study.”
Simplicity:  “Consider your clothes.  Most people have no need for more clothes.  They buy more not because they need clothes, but because they want to keep up with the fashions.  Hang the fashions.  Buy only what you need.  Wear you clothes until they are worn out.  Stop trying to impress people with your clothes and impress them with your life.”
Solitude: “One reason we can hardly bear to remain silent is that it makes us feel so helpless.  …The tongue is our most powerful weapon of manipulation.  A frantic stream of words flows from us because we are in a constant process of adjusting our public image.  We fear so deeply what we think other people see in us, so we talk in order to straighten out their understanding.”
Submission: “I said that every Discipline has its corresponding freedom.  What freedom corresponds to Submission?  It is the ability to lay down the terrible burden of always needing to get our own way.  …In the Discipline of submission we are released to drop the matter, to forget it.  Frankly, most things in life are not nearly so important as we think they are.”
Service: “More than any other single way the grace of humility is worked into our lives through the Discipline of service.  …When we set out on a consciously chosen course of action that accents the good of others and is for the most part a hidden work, a deep change occurs in our spirit.  Nothing disciplines the inordinate desires of the flesh like service, and nothing transforms the desires of the flesh like serving in hiddenness.  The flesh whines against service but screams against hidden service.”
Confession: “Without the cross the Discipline of confession would be only psychologically therapeutic.  But it is so much more.  It involves an objective change in our relationship with God and a subjective change in us.  It is a means of healing and transforming our spirit.”
Worship: “Forms and rituals do not produce worship, nor does the formal disuse of forms and rituals.  We can use all the right techniques and methods, we can have the best possible liturgy, but we have not worshiped the Lord until Spirit touches spirit.”
Guidance: “In our day heaven and earth are on tiptoe waiting for the emerging of a Spirit-led, Spirit-intoxicated, Spirit-empowered people…of a disciplined, freely gathered, martyr people who know…the life and power of the kingdom of God.  It has happened before.  It can happen again.”
Celebration: “It is an occupational hazard of devout folk to become stuffy bores.  That should not be.  Of all people we should be the most free, alive, interesting.  Celebration adds a note of gaiety, festivity, hilarity to our lives.  After all, Jesus rejoiced so fully in life that He was accused of being a wine-bibber and a glutton.  Many of us lead such sour lives that we couldn’t possibly be accused of such things.”
I said I wanted to whet your appetite.  Hungry?  Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be filled!

I’m not pro-choice, but…

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

…should I as a pro-life Christian vote for the “electable” Rudy Giuliani or the recently-converted Mitt Romney instead of the more purely pro-life but probably unelectable Sam Brownback or Mike Huckabee?

Part of the brilliant success of the Anglo-American political experiment is that we are pragmatists who do not let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  The utopian political movements (e.g., fascism, communism) will settle for nothing less than absolute perfection, and inevitably (so far, at least) end up in totalitarianism and tyranny.

I have vowed, “I’ll never again vote for a pro-choice candidate.  If he can’t get it right on issues of life and death, his positions on lesser issues don’t really matter.”  Am I being a utopian ideologue?  Or should I take a position more like Martin Luther, who maintained that he would rather be governed by a competent Muslim than an incompetent Christian?

The Truth About Muhammad

Saturday, August 4th, 2007
The subtitle is: “Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion.”  That explains why www.revivingislam.com contains this opinion of the author: “May Allah rip out his spine from his back and split his brains in two, and then put them both back, and then do it over and over again.”

The author is Robert Spencer, whose The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades.  That one was loosely organized and rather light in terms of research.

The Truth About Muhammad focuses on the life, words, and deeds of Islam’s founder, because Muslims throughout the centuries have held up their prophet as the supreme model of a human being.

This book also grounds its contents primarily in the words of credible Islamic writings themselves, thus making it extremely well-researched and much more authoritative.  It’s a pretty good popular-level reference work on Islam’s founder and founding principles.

The last three pages of the book touches on a program for combatting radical Islam today:
  1. Stop insisting Islam is a religion of peace.
  2. Initiate a full-scale Manhattan Project to find new energy sources.
  3. Make Western aid contingent upon renunciation of the jihad ideology.
  4. Call upon American Muslim advocacy groups to work against the jihad ideology.
  5. Revise immigration policies with the jihad ideology in view.
Spencer concludes: “The words and deeds of Muhammad have been moving Muslims to commit acts of violence for fourteen hundred years now.  They are not going to disappear in our lifetimes; nor can they be negotiated away.  The best thing Western governments can do is recognize their character and move to limit their influence within their countries and around the world…  The sooner this is done, the safer we all will be.  But as long as this manifold problem continues to be ignored, Muhammad will continue to inspire his followers to wield the sword in his name.”

I’m not a xenophobe, but…

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007

…I give due respect to the opinions of America’s founding fathers on the now seemingly omnipresent topic of immigration.

Alexander Hamilton, for example, believed that the health of the republic depends “essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment, on a uniformity of principles and habits, on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice, and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education, and family.  …The influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to produce a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities.  In the composition of society, the harmony of the ingredients is all-important, and whatever tends to a discordant intermixture must have an injurious tendency.”

George Washington wrote to John Adams: “The policy of [immigration] taking place in a body (I mean the settling of [immigrants] in a body) may be much questioned; for by so doing, [immigrants] retain the language, habits, and principles (good or bad) which they bring with them.”

Thomas Jefferson mused, “Suppose 20 millions of republican Americans thrown all of a sudden into France, what would be the condition of that kingdom?  If it would be more turbulent, less happy, less strong, we may believe that the addition of half a million of foreigners to our present numbers would produce a similar effect here.”

I wonder what these national fathers would say about 12-15 million illegal immigrants, separating themselves into ghettos and barrios, not learning the English language, and maintaining national, ethnic, and racial allegiances outside of mainstream America?

I think I already know…